Tradeshow Marketing (TSHO): does the world really need another Spongetech (SPNG)

First it was ShamWow, the miracle towel that faded from glory after pitchman Vince Shlomi was arrested for beating up a prostitute.

Next came Spongetech (pink sheets:SPNG), which Timothy Sykes correctly exposed as a pump-and-dump operation.

Now, in case you were itching to invest your hard-earned money in a penny stock promising to make fortunes hawking a water-removal contraption, Skymark Research has just the company for you.  Skymark dug deep into its research base mercilessly pumps for the low, low fee of $5,000/month a tiny outfit called Tradeshow Marketing (OTC BB:TSHO) that just happens to be rolling out infomercials of….The Ultimate Squeegee.  Incredibly, Skymark tries to sell TSHO by arguing it will be even better than Spongetech:

Friday after-market Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd. (TSHO) announced its first infomercial product (see news below), the Ultimate Squeegee! To view the working footage to date, visitwww.ultimatesqueegee.com. With this recent development, the Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd.(TSHO), has moved from a speculative company- to a very real company with the potential to produce very real revenue with their first infomercial. 

The Ultimate Squeegee, with the assistance of Cesari Direct, looks to have all of the qualifications to become a hit, thus potentially earning Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd. (TSHO) between $20M-$70M in revenue.

Some of the Key Factors for Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd. (Ultimate Squeegee)'s success:

1. Cesari Direct's track record and proffessionalism has helped create billion dollar products on TV, many times over in the past. 
2. TSHO's Management 100% committed to delivering on its business plan, Friday's development is proof of this. 
3. Millions of people/investors will see the Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd. on TV and the stock symbol: TSHO in early 2010.
4. An affordable product with massive appeal to anybody with a window or mirror, which makes something nobody likes to do: cleaning, quick and easy.
5. Three infomercials to follow in 2010 with 15 other products ready for TV, Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd. (TSHO) is not just a one product company, but have 60 products in their portfolio.

6. Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd. (TSHO) doesn't just do the infomercials, they own the exclusive rights to the products in North-America. 

With the recent developments, Tradeshow Marketing Company Ltd. (TSHO), is positioned to become a major player in the $150 Billion dollar DRTV Industry.

Remember what happened when SPNG launched its national infomercial campaign. It's market capitalization saw an increase from under $19M to over $200M within a period 3 months. The exposure brought mass revenues and never-before seen volume into its stock, moving SPNG from $0.02 to a $0.28 high, with volume in excess of 500 million shares per day!

Remember: SPNG has over 700M shares outstanding, while TSHO only has 23 million shares outstanding!

 

Unbelievable!  Avoid.
 
DISCLOSURE: no position.

 

Related posts:

  1. Tradeshow Marketing (TSHO.PK) investors get squeegeed by pump-n-dumpers
  2. Skymark crosses ethical lines to pump Tradeshow Marketing (TSHO.OB)

16 Comments for

Tradeshow Marketing (TSHO): does the world really need another Spongetech (SPNG)

  • Lee markle |

    It's statements like the following that prove you are stuying to be an idiot:
    Next came Spongetech (pink sheets:SPNG), which Timothy Sykes correctly exposed as a pump-and-dump operation.
    Where is the proof that spng is a pump and dump.  By the way, today they just won their case against Spongeables.  I suppose that is typical of a pump and dump.

  • MS |

    Lee, sorry you lost money on Spongetech. Better luck going forward.

  • James Malone |

    Here's a simple idea: cone back to this article in 1 year's time, and let's see whether TSHO is up or down.

    My bet it up.

    Time will tell. 

    All I know is that company that those quotes are from- is called Skymark Research. Any shred of DD on this company clearly shows their track-record is unchallenged. They have public phone numbers, an office that is open for clients to stop-by: open book access to all of their research- how can a company be any more transparent?

    I don't know who wrote this article, but two seconds of background into Skymark… puts some heavy hitting support behind TSHO.

    And that's not even getting into TSHO itself. Contracts with Cesari Direct, well- just look at who they are: http://www.cesaridirect.com. Any wise investor is going to research their investments before they buy, and with the wealth of information pointing towards TSHO's success: for me- it's a long position.

    Please: anyone who has any information otherwise: bring it to our attention:

    We are a dedicated group of investors who seek to critically judge and examine all evidence to arrive at realistic and honest valuations of our investments.

    The forum address is: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=8990.

    Again, if there is any information that points towards the potential failure, or slightest indication of concern with TSHO- please let us know!

    We address all issues, and do not ignore any information. Our hard-earned dollars are invested into this company, and we wish to ensure are dollars are well-placed.

    Thank-you,

    James M. "maone15"

  • Tina |

    Ok I see many people critique the idea of the Squeegee that its not all that. Ok maybe its not but it does not mean that it will not sell. 

    You see a stock price whether you want to believe it or not is based on REVENUES and how much of the piece of pie each shareholder can get-that is where the outstanding shares come into play. 

    So for instance if you have a million dollar market cap and say 1 share outstanding (just to make the math easy) share price will be 1,000,000 dollars. But say you have 2 shares outstanding share price would be 500,000 dollars. 

    Now you can have a great idea -for example there is a company out there that makes organic fertilizer from garbage and the fertilizer provides optimum results and they get tipping fees to haul away that garbage from commercial places like hospitals, restaurants, etc. However themanagement kept diluting the shareholders to finance the operations resulting in more Outstanding Shares and not to mention many glitches on the way in the production line that kept them from producing at full capacity. They are selling the fertilizer in stores like Home Depots so the product does exist. 

    Now you have something like TSHO where their overhead expenses are minimum and the management is not planning to increase the O/S and a stupid thing like Snuggie sold Millions of product so this product is sure to sell whether you think its stupid or not and I think the bigger customer will not be individuals but retails Like Walmart. 

    So just cuz you may think the product is not worth it does not mean that the company will not make money. 

    As long as the company makes money stock price goes up. Shorters can short this stock temporarily to bring the pps up but eventually the stock price will catch up to its fair value. 

    Also what TSHO has that SPNG didn't have was Cesa

  • James Malone |

    meant to write "come" instead of "cone"

  • James Malone |

    To the author: I just noticed you have "Bill Cara" listed in your "links" section. If you do indeed know him, then you know he works with Skymark Research- with quite the reputation and following.
    .
    So perhaps- this article on TSHO deserves a second thought. Perhaps, it may not be a bad idea to actual research a stock before writing an article. It certainly sounds to me like some proper investigative journalism is in order.
    .
    I sincerely hope you do look further, and I very much look forward to your findings!
    .
    When you do a little digging, you will find Skymark usually recommends NASDAQ companies, and very rarely do they recommend OTCBB, or a Pink Sheet for that matter. But I'm sure they even understand, that the Pink OTC Market is just an exchange- it does not affect the quality of the company traded.
    .
    TSHO's share structure, business plan, and people involved is certainly on-par, if not far-exceeding the average micro-cap Nasdaq. 23.1M shares, with complete transparency and regular reporting- and no dilution… And with full disclosure on every compensation directed towards consultants and infomercial and market firms, I wonder what has turned you off on this company?
    .
    Perhaps it was simply the "knee-jerk" reaction to cringe at a Pink Sheet, and hope the statistics are on your side- to prevent any sort of actual investigation.  I suspect however, that you have some genuine intention of providing an accurate and investigative source of information to your readers. I, along with your readers, would encourage you, please let us hear some solid, research and reasoned thoughts on this company. I for one, a very-much enthused to read your follow-up article! 

  • MS |

    @James: thanks for your comments.

    <<

    Here's a simple idea: cone back to this article in 1 year's time, and let's see whether TSHO is up or down.

    My bet it up.

    Time will tell.>>

    You're on.  Kindly remind me in a year's time and I will revisit.  As for Skymark Research, here is how Skymark describes their services for TradeShow:

    Visitors to Skymark Research are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these statements. These statements have not been independently verified by the officers, directors or employees of Skymark Research. Information on this Skymark Research has been provided by the companies contained herein or other sources believed to be reliable. Skymark Research has not independently verified the information provided to it by third parties and has been paid five thousand dollars to conduct research on Trade Show Marketing Co.  by a third party to the company, Skymark Research expects to be paid a minimum of five thousand dollars per month for research and advertising purposes.  

  • Mike Henderson |

    Spng is unlike the usual ponzi scheme of most penny stocks, where the idea is to get in and out guickly and leave the last in line to suffer the loss. If one adopts the Idea that you can buy a stock today for the long term, ( currently between 4 and 5 cents )  and hold a year or two then the potential is greater here than anything I have seen to date. Much has been said about this stock, mostly on a slanderous level. I have yet to see anything of a verifiable and creditable nature that this company is not all the management claims.The sales have been incredible, they are without debt, and retail sales and  advertising have been constantly and consisently climbing. They are selling on an international level and the growth in the past year has become legendary and the envy of every penny stock out.

  • More on TradeShow Marketing (TSHO) | Microcap Speculator — microcapspeculator.net |

    [...] have been deluged by emails, and a few comments, regarding my article on TradeShow Marketing (pink [...]

  • The All Knowing |

    Total Pump-N-Dump !!!!!!!!

  • James Malone |

    @The_All_Knowing – Your argument leaves much to be desired.

  • Justin |

    Looks like you should have got in.  I would say up over 100% since this article was written is pretty good.

  • Jon Romero |

    Now that a month or so has past since your last post. What do you think of TSHO now? Are you guys feeling like fools and just to ashamed to post another bashing blog. IMO I don't think you did all your homework before posting such an uneducated piece of work. Hope you do some reasearch and realize the mistake you made on this company. GLTA. Go TSHO!!!!

  • MS |

    @Jon: try to get your facts straight before posting another nasty comment. Thanks.

  • Penny stock scam Tradeshow Marketing exposed — microcapspeculator.net |

    [...] $30 a share based on future sales. Incredibly, the Microcap Speculator noted, SkyMark compared TSHO to SpongeTech (OTC: SPNG.PK) – a stock halted last year over questionable promotions – [...]

  • investor_2009 |

    Those who are trying to make out too much of Skymark's comparision of TSHO and SPNG, I would say just this – see what you want to see, read what you want to read. Skymark is not comparing the mangement, the execution, or even the busines plan. They are just comparing the valuations that the markets provide to two companies trying to see with similar distribution channel. Its that simple
    Stop bashing, just because you may see money in a company's downfall. Write down the numbers, post it here, and then come back

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

Name *
Mail *
Website